A Short Report About the ECA (Powerpoint Idiocy Included!)

I was unable to write anything of substance this week, and this was why. On top of having to write a report and presentation on an interest group, our class also had a unit test, and I was busy with other work as well.

But, since the ECA is technically video game-related, I thought I'd post it here, instead of letting it go to waste. If you doubt the fact that I actually showed these slides to my class, I guess I can't convince you; just take my word for it.

Finally, I'm not 100% sure that everything here is true, but I did do a fair amount of research, considering we only had a week and change to put this whole thing together.

 

The Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA for short) is a single-interest group dedicated to voicing the concerns of consumers of electronic media, specifically video games. They also serve as benefits group, providing members with a discount at various retailers and stores. Most of their income comes from membership fees, as well as partnerships with the retailers whose prices they discount.

The ECA was founded in 2006 by Hal Halpin, who had formerly founded the Interactive Entertainment Merchants Association (IEMA). The IEMA was also an interest group, but this one was focused on assuring that the people who made games had more control in both their content and their distribution.

Seeing that the IEMA had been extremely successful in its efforts to give video game publishers more control over their products, Halpin felt the need to for a similar interest group, but one that focused primarily on the consumer1. Though organizations such as the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) and Environmental Media Association (EMA) and Halpin's own IEMA had made great strides to allow video game publishers and developers greater creative and economic freedom, Halpin, a veteran felt that there lacked an equivalent for consumers; though most any sort of game could be made, consumers were restricted in what they could buy, and how they interacted with their products.

Halpin's other goal with the ECA was to create a twenty-first century advocacy group2. This new sort of advocacy group would use the resources of the new millennium – such as the message boards, social media outlets, and other internet resources – to advance the group's goals, rather than rely on the slow methods of older groups.

The ECA uses these new mediums to further their agenda, which consists of giving “gaming consumers a voice and ensure that state and local politicians hear their concerns and appreciate their demographic power3.”

The ECA primarily focuses on issues of consumer rights in the realm of video games. They aim to empower the average consumer in their ability to purchase the entertainment they choose, regardless of content. Believing that allowing people to buy the things they want is protected by the first amendment, the ECA seeks to fight legislation that in any way gets in the way of that right.

There are a number of issues that they've been involved in, with varying degrees of success. The most famous issue involves both the classification of certain video games and their distribution to minors.

The ECA's first big political battle was lobbying support of the Fair Use Act, which would limit the power of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)4. The DMCA criminalizes the circumvention of any sort of Digital Rights Management (DRM) on any sort of of electronic or digital media. DRM is installed on many video games, music CD's and digital downloads to ensure that illegal copies are not made. The Fair Use Act would allow consumers to get around DRM on certain conditions, such as research or personal archiving.

Though the Act has not yet been passed (it was first introduced in October of 2007), it has sparked much debate over how much ownership users have over the things they have. Though most agree that users should be able to freely distribute the products they own to other users – an act that essentially cuts the game publisher out of a potential sale – many question to what extent a company can limit this control, since many DRM setups can be invasive to the user's privacy, with programs such as SecuROM damaging computers and making themselves impossible to uninstall5. Many also question the ability of such DRM to actually prevent the creation of illegal copies, and posit that they make the people who buy the product legitimately seem like criminals while the pirates will undoubtedly find ways to bypass these protection software6.

The ECA is also committed to helping improve the quality of broadband connections across the United States. Joining forces with Connected Nation, a similar interested interest group, to launch the Universal Broadband movement, which aims to increase of the quality of life through better technologies and internet access7

Finally, the ECA supports the concept of Net Neutrality8. Net Neutrality is the legal ideology that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) should not be allowed to control the flow of their users' internet access; without Net Neutrality, an ISP is able to change the amount of money it can charge you depending on how much internet you use. For example, if a users the internet for a certain amount of time in a given month, without Net Neutrality, the ISP could discontinue your use of the internet for the rest of the month if it believes you've used more internet time than you're paying for.

The ECA has also had a number of issues within its own group. Many members have complained about the difficulty in canceling their membership. Currently, the only way to cancel a membership with the ECA – which is $20 per year – which is is to send a letter to their accounting office with your cancellation notice. Before December of 2009, there existed a much easier option which let users cancel their membership online. The ECA has stated that stated that the web solution was never supposed to exist in the first place9.

The ECA is relatively small group withing the interest group spectrum, though it has nonetheless made progress in its goal to allow the consumer the right to choose his or her own entertainment.

1The ECA. “History.” http://www.theeca.com/about_history

2The ECA. “FAQ.” http://www.theeca.com/faq

3Ibid.

4Sinlair, Brendon. “ECA crosses ESA on DMCA.” Gamespot.com. http://www.gamespot.com/news/6181808.html

5Pigna, Kris. "EA Hit with Class Action Lawsuit over Spore DRM". 1UP.com. http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3170131.

6Terrel, Kenneth; Rosen, Seth. “A Nation of Pirates.” U.S. News & World Report, 7/14/2003, Vol. 135 Issue 1, p40, 6p, 3 color, 1bw; Reading Level (Lexile): 1250

7IGN Staff “Connected Nation and Entertainment Consumers Association Join Forces for Universal Broadband.” IGN.com. http://games.ign.com/articles/887/887957p1.html

8 The ECA. “Gamers For Net Neutrality.” theeca.com. http://www.theeca.com/gamers_net_neutrality

9Walters, Chris. “ECA Tries to Prevent Members From Cancling.” theconsumerist.com. http://consumerist.com/2009/12/eca-tries-to-prevent-members-from-canceling.html

Comments (0)

Write comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.