JUSTIN TILLERY
COMMUNITY WRITER
XBL -NONE-
PSN -NONE-
WII
-NONE-
STEAM -NONE-
JUSTIN TILLERY'S SPONSOR
POST BY THIS AUTHOR (0)
COMMENTS BY THIS AUTHOR (2)
"
Dude, in your 4th paragraph, you complained that a cave in Afghanistan looked "dark and muddy." Uhm...? Also, do you work with any Rangers or SF? Because while they might not act with Bravado twhen around others, because why would they, when in a combat situation that bravado thing comes in to play. They're totally focused and professional, and probably don't say hooah, but what's wrong with "Let's kick everybodies ass"? Also, I know a few meatheads, and they're still good soldiers.
"
Yesterday
"
Alright, I'm in the military and I'm in a combat MOS, and honestly I prefer the single player over the online play. You said it wasn't touching, but let's state that the level "Danger Close" is close to the account given by Navy Seal Marcus Lattrell in his book "Lone Survivor", when he and 3 other seals fought their way down a mountain in a losing battle, running out of ammo. Also, in single player the scopes, NODs, and PEQ 2s are accurate. The M145 on the M249 in the single player is the same one I used overseas, whereas online, they've got ridiculous scopes that don't actually do anything. If you upgrade your scope and your ammo on the SAW, with the muzzle brake, your total weapon score actually goes DOWN. What the heck? I got to Tier 1 status so that I could have a CRAPPIER weapon? That doesn't make sense. Also, noone uses the M-16 anymore, other than guys who sit in a FOB all day. The M-4 is the standard. A Ranger certainly isn't going to be using an M-16. Online, the game makes me yell at my TV for being unrealistic hot garbage, while the single player took me for a nice, (albeit short lived) spin. Fun game single player, but definetaly not worth my 50 bucks.
"
Yesterday
