Separator
ALEX BOWEN
COMMUNITY WRITER
Default_picture
Followers (0)
Following (0)
LOCATION
TWITTER  -NONE-
FACEBOOK  -NONE-
WEBSITE  -NONE-
LINKEDIN  -NONE-
XBL  -NONE-
PSN  -NONE-
WII   -NONE-
STEAM  -NONE-
ALEX BOWEN'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
POST BY THIS AUTHOR (0)
COMMENTS BY THIS AUTHOR (9)
" href="http://twitter.com/alexsktbrdng/status/9305830596">http://twitter.com/alexsktbrdng/status/9305830596 Thanks guys!! Game looks great :"
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
"at article, guys"
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
" href="http://twitter.com/alexsktbrdng/status/8890572687">http://twitter.com/alexsktbrdng/status/8890572687 Thanks guys!"
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
" really could say that about 90% of game sequels. Sorry, man, I have to disagree. I'm biased, though because I loved the the first game and if they threw a lump of crap in a box I'd pay $60 for it"
Monday, February 08, 2010
" ARE kidding about Modern Warfare 2, right"
Sunday, December 06, 2009
"nks for the contest, Bitmob! The art style of this game looks very cool I'd love to try it :"
Thursday, October 15, 2009
"hink that we are receiving better games. Compare 'Splosion man (for example) to any game that came out in 05-06 (save for Geometry Wars) and I bet it beats them all. I think the price increase is fine, as long as the quality of game is worth. A great example is the new Turtles in Time game. I don't want to pay $10 for another re-hash that has 15 year old controls and levels, but I have no problem paying $15 for a game like Castle Crashers, Shadow Complex or Braid. Anybody who won't buy a game because it's more than $5 or $10 no matter what is just ignorant. It's like saying I wont buy a next-gen game because they aren't $50 anymore."
Monday, August 24, 2009