Separator

3 ways to improve Gears of War 3

Rm_headshot
Thursday, May 05, 2011

If our recent game night didn't clue you in, we've been rocking a lot of Gears of War 3 multiplayer beta 'round Bitmob way of late, and it's been sweet, sweet carnage so far. Why, I'm even considering a preorder...something Gears of War 2 didn't inspire.


World's best gardening tool.

But nothing's perfect. Hell, that's why we have betas: to make things perfect. So while the happy maniacs at Epic Games pore over reams of data, I've got some suggestions of my own. Stuff that doesn't come down to mere bullet counts, high-death areas, or weapon balancing. No, I'm talking about how the game feels as you play it, where it feels wrong, and how to make it right.

Here's how you make the bloodbath better.

 

1. My house

Nothing beats a solid King of the Hill mode. It's my favorite flavor of multiplayer, just as it is in real life, and GOW 3 puts down a fairly decent Crazy Kings version. Nothing fancy, not messing with the basic formula...except for two things. First, that hill? It's small. Like, maybe half the size of a Halo hill.

And it should be smaller. Hula-hoop sized.

Hey, I'm not here to make your life easier. Smaller hills mean insanity during captures and breaks, and I like insanity. Don't worry about five beefy, sweaty men all rubbing together while holding chainsaw bayonets; GOW's hill locks after a capture, so you don't actually have to stay inside the ropes to keep scoring. You just have to stand still to start the fun. Nothing dangerous about that, right?

Smaller hill. You'll thank me later.

Dom Gears of War 3
Hey...somebody unlocked his Tier 1 beard!

2. Points where points are due

Right around the two-week mark, Epic unlocked the Capture the Leader mode. Despite the subtle clues in its title, I had no trouble finding an unprotected leader, taking him hostage, and holding him for the entire 30-second countdown while everyone else fought on the other side of the map. I won the round for my team singlehandedly...and ranked bottom of the pile for experience points earned. Why? Because I did it without killing anybody.

Similarly, you get a pittance for reviving a downed teammate. I routinely find myself ignoring those fools in order to finish off a distant enemy, and by the time that's done...whoops. Dead teammate. Oh well.

Wrong and wrong. Experience points let a developer influence player actions, passing out cool rewards for doing what the developer wants. So maybe we should actually do that. Make captures, breaks, revives, and anything else vital to success pay out more than simply shooting up baddies. Otherwise I'll ignore the objectives and just go around capping folks. I might lose the game, but if I still walk away with all the XP, a winner is me.

Gears of War 3 team
This is the part where I drop a mortar on them and win the war.

3. Shotgun divorce

I've heard people complain the Lancer assault rifle's overpowered now, and they're on drugs. It's more powerful, but make no mistake...Gears multiplayer is still a shotgun game. Jump close, blow person in half. The new sawed-off shotgun just punctuates this point. Rifles close the distance, but shotties finish the job.

So I want a mode (or mode variant) that limits available weapons. Specifically, no shotguns. It'll be the most unpopular game ever, but I'm OK with that. Learn to use the Boltok pistol, which is just as deadly. Halo's weapon-specific games (like Swords) add a nice twist to a standard kill-em-all romp, and limiting Gears' already-limited arsenal mixes things up even more. Any time you take players out of their comfort zone, you're doing God's work, and paring down to a Torque Bows-only match or a Hammerburst-fest would narrow your tactical focus to an entertaining degree.

Plus, I want to see all those shotgun messiahs cry true tears because they don't know where the melee button is. Don't you?

 
Problem? Report this post
RUS MCLAUGHLIN'S SPONSOR
Comments (7)
167586_10100384558299005_12462218_61862628_780210_n
May 05, 2011

Great article. I actually agree with you regarding the objective game tweaks. Honestly, though, I rarely play Gears without my "team" and they rarely play objective games so I don't have much to add to that discussion.

Shotguns, however, I'm full of rage about. The Sawed-off is complete overkill. If you know how to use the Gnasher, and use it well, you don't need the noob-handicapped blast-fest that is the sawed-off. Even if you haven't mastered the up-close gibblet blast, there's always what my friends and I call the two-piece: a quick bash and a blast does the job. I can't tell you how many times I've rounded a corner only to find myself instantly blown away.

Though I will use the Retro Lancer occasionally, I feel like the new lancer/shotgun variants were added to aid newcomers to the steep learning curve that is Gears multiplayer. After how much I've practiced with the old weapons to get good, I can't say I'm happy about it.

Wolvie
May 05, 2011

I do slightly disagree with the shotgun point because now the Retro Lancer has been added. That's pretty much the anti-shotgun weapont, amazingly powerful, and works very well at close - medium range. Run away and shoot them where they can't shoot you it works perfect! And when considering the SoS you have to ake into account it's downfalls, like it's range, reload speed, etc. it's not bthe most ideal weapon. 

Wolvie
May 05, 2011

Please ignore extra letters and missing letters, my keyboard is broken, and I can't spot every mistake!

167586_10100384558299005_12462218_61862628_780210_n
May 05, 2011

The regular Lancer's clip is so much bigger than the Retro, that it's really the way to go. If you can evade a guy using the retro for long enough, you can nail him while he's reloading pretty easily. The regular Lancer is still firing for a good two or three seconds after the Retro has run out. As to how effective the Retro is against shotguns, I'm not so sure. The sawed-off, yes. The Gnasher, not so much. The range on the Retro is just too small to have it be viable against a Gnasher.

Wolvie
May 05, 2011

Well, the Retro has a larger range than the Gnasher, which pretty much makes it very viable against a Gnasher, unless you get too close of course. I'm a regular user of the Retro, and the only trimes I really get killed are at very close range by the SoS or if I get fairly close and a Gnasher out fires me. 

But I do agree with the clip size point, more games should take inspiration from this. Besides the Gnasher's range, I think this game has been very very well balanced.

167586_10100384558299005_12462218_61862628_780210_n
May 05, 2011

Yeah, but at range a rifle is going to be more powerful than the Gnasher. I do agree that it might be a bit too far, though.

Mobpic
May 05, 2011

How about a shotguns only mode instead? or maybe boomshot only KOTH

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.