Separator
Gaming Content on TV Doesn't Work
Thursday, November 04, 2010
EDITOR'S NOTEfrom James DeRosa

I haven't had cable since 2001, so I've never watched G4. This definitely means I'm not in a position to judge the quality of their programming. But at the same time, it also indicates a trend that many people from my generation get along just fine with nothing but the Internet.

The Internet has destroyed the need for a game-centric TV network in America. The tech-head and the gamer are two concepts that go together in the West, and no group is drifting further away from television than those who know their way around a keyboard.

On November 1, DirecTV announced that they would no longer be carrying G4, a network that has billed itself as “TV for gamers” since it first launched in 2002. If DirecTV gives a station the boot, it usually means it will soon shoot into obscurity -- like NBC’s Trio network -- but the backing of Comcast might help keep the channel on the air. 

G4 has had a pretty rocky history. Although it started out with plenty of gaming-related content, including a news program and weekly, live call-in show, the network has morphed into something else entirely -- especially after they merged with TechTV. Fast-forward to the present. Geek favorites like The Screen Savers turned into Attack of the Show, and Cops and Cheaters replaced original programming like Icons. The last true remnant of TechTV -- and the last bit of gaming content -- is X-Play. Meanwhile, on the other side of the world, the population of South Korea is watching the Global StarCraft League on GOMtv. 

Interested parties in South Korea battle over broadcasting rights for StarCraft 2 tournaments, yet in North America, something like the Computer Gaming Series can’t even keep a spot on DirecTV’s exclusive (and content-starved) channel The 101.

 

Meanwhile, thanks to the miracle of the Internet, we can find enormous amounts of well-produced game-centric and tech-centric shows. Area5’s programming is extremely well done considering that it's mostly Web-based, and Giant Bomb alone produces more original content each week than G4 does. If we skip the visual realm and factor in podcasts, the amount of enthusiast entertainment out there expands enormously.

The only issue that might concern those who rely on the Internet is that it isn’t going to be free forever. Using my two prior examples, Area5’s previously free program CO-OP used to be an ad-supported Revision3 effort, whereas now they independently distribute the show for free, but they also charge for a high-resolution 1080p version. Giant Bomb, along with parent company Whiskey Media, have an ad-free yearly subscription that offers better video quality and a weekly live show that is only available to non-subscribers on a delay.

It seems that the pay-for-premium model is going to be the plan from here on out, and I have no issue with this. Top-shelf content is not cheap to produce, and the fact that Area5 and Giant Bomb still offer a version of their products for free is quite generous. Even though nerds may be cheap, we also want to support those who bring us our entertainment.  Korea’s GOMtv also offers tiered content: A subsciption to the Global StarCraft League gets you English commentary and archived match videos.

This is why gaming content on TV will never work: G4, and networks like it, are creating programming for tech-savvy people who know that they can pick and choose the media they want on the Internet -- either for free, or at a lower cost than the monthly bill for a entire 24-hour channel that features mostly non-gaming content.

When G4 started, broadband wasn’t as readily available as it is today. That's hard to believe since it was only eight years ago, but it’s true. I still have fond memories of the network in it’s early years, and I'm astonished that it ever made it off the ground, considering how risky the concept is. Although the channel has changed drastically over the years, it’s good to see that the concept of game-inspired entertainment hasn’t died. It’s just moved on to a delivery method that the audience prefers more.

 
8
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (11)
Default_picture
November 03, 2010


This month the UK gets a brand new gaming channel Ginx TV available on cable and Satelite, hopes aren't overly high at the moment as no-one has ever really got this right yet in the UK, http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-08/26/britain-videogames-tv the article by pocket lint here is very interesting on gaming TV and why they are sceptical http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/35214/ginx-games-channel-launch-november


Alexemmy
November 03, 2010


I don't know, I find it hard to actually sit down and watch any video content online. I'm always distracted by other things and never actually sit back to watch the wealth of great stuff available. I watch plenty of TV though, and whenever we visited my parents who have G4, I would always turn to it to see what they had on. Even if I was disappointed that whatever they were showing wasn't near as awesome as Icons or other past shows on the network, it felt like it was still the closest I would get to the content I wanted on the TV, and therefore I'd like it more.



It's kind of like when you turn on the radio and hear a song you can get behind. Not one you love, but one by a band that isn't completely terrible and you can support without feeling stupid. You could easily take out your ipod and listen to tons of much better stuff, but it's somehow cooler when you hear it on the radio.



That doesn't exactly disprove your point that gaming content on TV is pointless now, but it's why I'll miss G4, even if I only kind of enjoyed their content.


Robsavillo
November 03, 2010


Interesting argument, though, I don't think contrasting with South Korea helps your case: The country is one of the most connected places on the planet. If the Internet were the death of T.V. game programming, then the model wouldn't work in South Korea.



Instead, I'd argue that G4 is just a shit network with game-related content quickly made obsolete with online publications and personalities who just aren't that interesting. The "comedians" on that network aren't funny in the slightest (see Olivia Munn's failure on the Daily Show). If X-Play wants to keep an audience, they need to create content that goes beyond game reviews everyone read online (and sometimes in print!) weeks beforehand.


Alexemmy
November 03, 2010


@Rob - I enjoy Chris Hardwick, though I'll agree he's not actually funny while on G4. But his podcast has kept me entertained every week.


Robsavillo
November 03, 2010


Eh, that guy sucks. Daniel Tosh does the "Web Soup format" so much better. Hardwick's jokes always fall flat, and I especially disliked his style of self-deprecating humor on display a couple E3s ago. He's just not funny, period.


Alexemmy
November 03, 2010


Daniel Tosh reminds me of Dane Cook. All jocky and kind of a douche. What little I've seen of his show I've thought was completely unfunny. I could say that he's just not funny, period, but I'd rather say to each his own, because it's all opinion not fact.


Comicemblemlarge
November 04, 2010


The saddest part to me about G4 is that they had to take TechTV out with it.  The slightly awkward, incredibly nice and nerdy atmosphere of that network was lost forever when they took over.  I've never been one to watch TV but I'd always check TechTV if I had the time, but once G4 took over that was one less reason to have extended channels.


Dscn0568_-_copy
November 05, 2010


I think the problem with G4 is that the only time it's an actual games network is when it's covering the event like E3. The rest of the year it's Spike TV 2, which wasn't what I was hoping for in a video game channel. I liked that G4 covered EVO last year, though Adam Sessler really shouldn't have been a commentator during the finals and I ended up watching it through UStream anyway.


Brett_new_profile
November 05, 2010


Part of the problem is the way TV itself is structured. If we continue to see a breakdown in the traditional model -- in the forms of things like Apple TV and Google TV -- then I think we'll start to see a lot more gaming content on our televisions.


Default_picture
November 10, 2010


@Rob - Yeah, the original content would work SO much better if they had anyone with any actual talent.  Sessler's okay, but everyone else isn't fit for third tier web content.  I was sad that they didn't keep Seanbaby on Attack of the Show, he's actually funny.



As to Tosh, I think he's better because he can actually emote.  Sure its the full range of "snarky douchebag," but its still better than Web Soup's "Oh God what are these words on the teleprompter!?"


Robsavillo
November 10, 2010


Agreed, David. And just to reiterate a point I made earlier -- I flipped on X-Play tonight (my cable guide says its a new episode) for a few minutes, and they were talking about the Demon Hunter class reveal for Diablo 3...which was all over the Internet more than two weeks ago. Anyone who reads anything about games (who I imagine is X-Play's primary audience) won't find much new information on G4.


You must log in to post a comment. Please register or Connect with Facebook if you do not have an account yet.