Separator
News Blips: Roger Ebert on Games, Dragon Quest 9 Party, Sony on Nintendo 3D, and More
Photo-3
Thursday, July 01, 2010

Keep in mind, the News Blips column is not the proper forum to continue the never-ending "Are Games Art?" debate...I'm just sayin'.

News Blips:
 
Roger EbertChicago Sun-Times film critic Roger Ebert has a change of heart and admits that "it is quite possible a game could someday be great Art." After receiving over 4,500 comments in response to his previous blog, which stated that games could "never" be art, Ebert put out a humble response today in the Chicago Sun Times. In it, he points out that it's unfair of him to criticize games, since he doesn't play them, much like he "would never express an opinion on a movie (he) hadn't seen." I suggest reading through the article, but take a moment to reflect on the torture this man voluntarily subjected himself to by reading through all of those angry fanboy rants.
 
Nintendo plans to throw a Dragon Quest 9 launch party at the Nintendo World Store in New York on Saturday, July 10. Dragon Quest series creator Yuji Horii will be on hand to give autographs to the first 30 customers who pick up the new Nintendo DS game. I've never met Mr. Horii, but he once gave me props on my stencil-making skills. True story. [Joystiq]
 
Sony dislikes the "no 3D glasses needed" rhetoric Nintendo uses when promoting the 3DS. Speaking to IGN, Shuhei Yoshida, president of Sony's Worldwide Studios, said that "when you listen to what (Nintendo is) saying about the effect of 3D perspective [sic] to the games, they are saying the same message we are, but they don't have to bash some small part of what the other company is doing." In the interview, Yoshida also expressed a desire for the two companies to "work together to promote 3D." I dream of a day when video-game makers can work in harmony to ruin the eyesight of children everywhere.
 
According to recent a survey by research firm Ipsos MediaCT, 64 percent of gamers still prefer physical copies of games vs. digital downloads. British magazine MCV (via CVG) printed the results of this research, which had responses from 1,000 people. Personally, I'm somewhere in the middle -- though I love having physical discs, box art, etc., I also enjoy playing Rez HD (for this week's Bitmob Game Club) without having to deal with PS2 disc skipping.
 
4
ALEJANDRO QUAN-MADRID'S SPONSOR
Comments (8)
Lance_darnell
July 01, 2010


I would love to have a discussion with Ebert about many things, but not video games. His comments on the subject mean about as much to me as a dingo's view of Igloo-building.


Demian_-_bitmobbio
July 01, 2010


It seemed out of character for Ebert to make such a suspect and blatantly incendiary claim that games can *never* be art, regardless of whether they are now or not. Glad he finally owned up to it.


Jason_wilson
July 01, 2010


Roger Ebert has been one of my role models for a critic and writer. I was very sad when he dismissed games without giving them a fair shake, and I'm very happy to see him admit his mistake. I don't care how he feels about games; I do care about him being fair, as he's always been during his career. Not many people on the Internet admit they are wrong, and I applaud him for doing that.


Franksmall
July 01, 2010


This just seems a bit hypocritical and disengenouous when Sony has a major ad campaign out right now that uses a spokesman who has at times been used "to bash some small part of what the other company is doing."



Remember those "pew, pew, pew" Kevin Butler ads?



Sounds like Sony can dish it out, but can't take it. Especially when it cuts as deep as Nintendo's 3DS strategy does into Sony's 3D strategy. Nintendo has basically said "why go for 3D which uses glasses right now when tech that is eyeglass free is just on the horizon and OUR tech will be the first to debut it." Sony has a lot of good things going for them right now, but I don't think their all-in approach to the current state of 3D tech is one of them.


Franksmall
July 01, 2010


PS- I will bet you money that this is not the last we hear of Ebert opining on gaming. I think he is just trying to drive hits to his site at this point. He will flip-flop in a few months just to get the gamers blasting his site with hits once again.



I hope that is not true, though. I really do respect his as well. I was just more than a bit shocked when he talked about gaming without even bothering to try them out. Like he said- he would have never talked about a movie without seeing it first.


0827102146-01
July 01, 2010


I'm hoping that Mr. Ebert posted that response as a true reflection within himself and not as a publicity stunt to quell the masses.



I did respond to his new article, and I apologized for the brash fanboyism he encountered and tried to welcome into the industry, even if he doesn't plan on meddling in it for very long.



I also warned him not to give specifics, should he pick up a controller one day. God forbid someone flames him for trying games on account of him "picking the wrong one."


July 02, 2010


Alejandro, I find what you did with that rocket slime very agreeable.


Photo-3
July 03, 2010


@John, thanks for agreeing with me?


You must log in to post a comment. Please register or Connect with Facebook if you do not have an account yet.