Do We Want Ditsy Female Hosts on Video Game TV?

Default_picture
Friday, December 23, 2011

G4TV has essentially been gamers’ only resort for gaming-related programming for nine years now. As far as I can remember, it flew in the face of the corny and overly enthusiastic direction of GamePro TV and the more game show-emphasis of Nick Arcade that predate me.

Remember this?

Even in the early days of G4TV, the station had a vast array of very compelling content, with the late-night trailer reel of Cinematech, the incredible documentary series Icons, Judgment Day with the charismatic Tommy Tallarico and Victor Lucas, X-Play with its brutally-honest reviewing style, and the very informative, but not-so-in-your-face Screen Savers.

 

All the programming then looked to gamers with a certain degree of reverence and dignity. It was conceived with the understanding that the viewers are “nerds”, “geeks”, or technology enthusiasts in general, that they have habits that the normal human being does not, and that that difference was acceptable in society.

Them's quality people

But perhaps that was not enough. Or, the hardcore gamers that viewed G4TV were not numerous enough to produce numbers that would sustain G4 in its current state. Then by 2006, according to Variety magazine, “G4 is evolving into a lifestyle channel, peppered with videogame culture, as opposed to wall-to-wall games." And this was evident, as this shift coincided with G4’s new logo, as well as a whole host of different non-gaming programs, which personally disappointed me. I can recall turning on G4 time and time again, hoping that I just might tune in at the time when something at least vaguely tech-related was being aired.

G4's then-new edgy logo

Perusing G4TV.com can reveal the swath of shows that marred G4 for many. These started out with minor changes, but then G4 must have noticed a spike in ratings, and amped up the emphasis on non-gaming programs. These included meat-head shows like Ninja Warrior and Cops at first, but it all went downhill from there and progressively became more and more meat-headed in nature to include “shows” like The International Sexy Ladies Show, Cheaters, Web Soup, It's Effin' Science, That's Tough, Whacked Out Videos, and Wired for Sex.

Whatever it was, G4TV still exists and I suppose that could be considered a success in itself. Yet stating that comes with the concession that G4 now has less gaming coverage than ever before, so many of the much-beloved video game shows were dropped.

The station was clearly pandering for viewers and this was to the detriment of their programming and their audience’s respect. Who are they trying to appeal to? Jocks? Bros? Brojocks? Douchebags? It seems the latter is true anyway.

An accurate depiction of G4's target demographic

They tried to appeal to too many personalities at once, that is for certain. Maybe this is the result of “jocks” vastly outnumbering “nerds” in society, and thus, an inevitability of mainstream entertainment culture to wholly engulf niche entertainment culture. Or even “nerds” increasingly using the internet as a resource to view content, whereas “jocks”, or at least their similarly shallow adult selves to continue to prefer entertainment on television. All of this is speculation, however, as I’m grossly generalizing “jock” and “nerd” culture, and ignoring any potential interaction or cross-pollination that may occur.

The internet is an important point though, as it appears television programming is a relic that is no longer revered in as high esteem as internet-driven forms of entertainment. I do not doubt that a considerable portion of G4TV’s viewership was lost due to the internet, which in part explains the channel’s current web presence.

 

So after all this involved self-discourse, I find myself right where I started with my title, “Do We Want Ditsy Female Hosts on Video Game TV?” I got the idea for this title from watching Attack of the Show, the more in-your-face successor to the much beloved Screen Savers. With the rolling cast of Maxim models, and otherwise meathead heart-throbs, going in and out of AOTS, do we, or for that matter, did we ever come to watch G4TV as what was supposed to be a video game-centric channel to watch generally unintelligent and completely ignorant “babes” deliver news and issue completely anecdotal reviews on technology?

Sexy, but clueless.

Let me answer that one for you, probably not. G4TV was popular because it was the only channel available that solely focused on video games and the industry. Now, we as gamers have virtually no where to go should we want to watch video game-related programming, unless we are willing to remain beholden to the station’s limited show spots like X-Play, and AOTS (although the bro-mentality has leaked into AOTS to an extent as well).

 

Do Candace Bailey, Sara Underwood, Kristin Adams, Olivia Munn, or Layla Kayleigh really have a passion for games? The prospect of this being true seems doubtful. It appears as if they were brought aboard for no other purpose than for their eye-candy value. This, along with the numerous other decisions like to increase the number and length of commercial breaks lost me as a regular viewer. I don’t see why Sarah Lane and Morgan Webb were not enough, and most of all I doubt that they are the only truly tech-savvy female hosts that aren’t an eyesore to look at!

"A giga-what, now?!"

G4TV, why did you drop so many excellent shows, and add so many horrible ones?! There already exists a place for shows like that, and it’s called Spike TV!

 
Problem? Report this post
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (7)
Lolface
December 23, 2011

Um... if your title is refering to Candace Bailey, Sara Underwood, Kristin Adams, Olivia Munn, or Layla Kayleigh, then I have to say, with the exception of Kristin Adams who hosts the fairly insignificant segment "Cheat" on X-Play, none of them host a video game show. In fact, Olivia Munn and Layla Kayleigh don't even work for G4 anymore.

Default_picture
December 23, 2011

The title refers to the rolling cast of female co-hosts for Attack of the Show.  

Default_picture
December 23, 2011

Michael, your point is well-taken, but you are in fact just referring to one show. And "Attack of the Show" is very geek/nerd-oriented, even if its female co-hosts are sometimes a bit ditzy.

Ironmaus
December 23, 2011

I think the problem is the the changing face of nerd culture and the pursuit of a larger audience. In a search for greater viewership, the programmers have bypassed you. I say bypassed you, because it's clear from your piece that you were one of the people that was picked up during one of their many periods of change.

You remember Screen Savers from the G4 period. That's after the merger with TechTV, when they stripped out the hardcore tech hosts, subbing in more attractive personalities. G4 was able to capture your attention by merging nerdy+hot in their programming. You clearly weren't watching the shows back when they were just nerdy, either because you won't watch a show with attractive people or attractive people were the key to gaining wider distribution. It's strange for you to denigrate a number of recent female G4 personalities for being "unintelligent and completely ignorant 'babes'"—which discounts their worth for anything other than appearance as and ignores their educational achievements—when it was bringing in more "babes" that put the show in front of your nose in the first place.

Now that G4 has realized that they can improve viewership even further by shaving off some of the nerdy from the nerdy+hot equation, it's upsetting because they're catering to a broader audience instead of you. How would you have responded to someone who, in 2004, had said, "Why does G4 have to ruin TechTV shows by dumbing them down and filling them up with eye candy? I liked them better when they were full of jargon and everyday nerds"? As nerd culture merges with the mainstream, it will bend and warp, rendering unrecognizable previously key elements. It can be upsetting, but there's no sense being overwrought, and there's nothing to be gained by belittling these women who are just keeping up with the times.

Default_picture
December 24, 2011

Well Matthew, when Tech TV was its 'just nerdy' self, I was just six years old (1998). By the time I was mature enough to realize I was a "gamer" and that playing games was more than a hobby to me was around the time I first witnessed G4TV (2002/2003 or so).

So it was not by any means intentional that I discovered G4TV when I did. And you are missing my point by assuming that I am older than I actually am. 

When I was ten in 2002, I hadn't the slightest understanding of sex appeal, and therefore wasn't drawn to G4TV for its cast of attractive female hosts. I just enjoyed the idea of a television channel entirely focused around video games!

Ironmaus
December 24, 2011

I'm sorry that you missed out on the early days of nerd broadcasting when people thought that an entire cable channel devoted exclusively to technology would be feasible. I too enjoy the idea of a television channel entirely focused on video games, and I'm a little sad that it's a completely unrealistic idea. And that is at the heart of my rebuttal to the premise of  your editorial.

It would be wonderful if television had a niche channel for every subculture. I'm sure there are at least a handful of people who would like a television channel devoted entirely to male bodybuilder birdwatchers, but the viewership would be unsuportably tiny. In the marketplace, programmers are going to do whatever they can to ensure large numbers of viewers. That may sometimes mean catering to a subculture, but only until they figure out a way to expand the audience.

Your editorial boils down to: "I want a television channel that is about my interests and doesn't use sexuality to pander to people who aren't as hardcore about my interests as I am." I get that. We all get that. It is a completely understandable feeling. But it's not realistic, and it's a poor justification for name calling and reducing female entertainers to "ignorant 'babes.'"

Default_picture
January 18, 2012

This: "I want a television channel that is about my interests and doesn't use sexuality to pander to people who aren't as hardcore about my interests as I am." 

But the "ignorant babes" claim comes from the fact that they are force-fed lines via teleprompters, they have no clue as to what they are saying, and are only payed to do so because the size of their breasts instead of their intellect. 

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.