Separator
Hit or Miss Weekend Recap - Jan. 10, 2010
Default_picture
Sunday, January 10, 2010

Holy hell, it's the first real Hit or Miss of the decade! This week: James Cameron defends his tacky and cringe-inducing use of metaphors by using a tacky and cringe-inducing metaphor to criticize gamers; EA Sports sticks by Tiger Woods mostly because they're screwed and have no choice; EA Sports suddenly remembers that NBA Jam is frickin' awesome; and Microsoft inspires a wave of indifference with the announcement of Game Room.

 

Cameron: Chain-Smoking Avatar Character a Criticism of Gaming

I know gamers tend to get reflexively defensive whenever the slightest hint of criticism is levied against us, but allow me a counterargument here that's slightly (but just slightly) in defense of James Cameron: People have actually played video games to death.

So yes, while James Cameron probably could have linked Sigourney Weaver's chain-smoking Avatar character to unhealthy gamers in a more tactful way, that doesn't make the line of argument universally unsound. To reiterate: When people have played video games to death, I'd say there's a valid criticism here somewhere.

But really, gamers, you're going to complain that a metaphor in Avatar is too clunky and heavy-handed? Avatar? The movie about nature-loving natives being attacked by a brutal American-led army to seize a potent resource literally called "unobtanium"? Just be happy Cameron didn't throw in a scene showing Weaver's character playing whatever the hell the World of Warcraft of 2154 is (probably still World of Warcraft) and saying, "Boy, protagonist Jake Sully, I sure don't care about my human body!" while freebasing heroin.


EA Sports Explains Why They're Sticking by Tiger Woods

Quick: Name a professional golfer other than Tiger Woods who could still be recognized by people who don't give a damn about golf?

And that's exactly why EA Sports isn't actually sticking by Tiger Woods, they're stuck with him. Because right now they have two choices: 1) rename and rebrand one of their most popular sports series without a single viable option to take Tiger's place, or 2) keep as their mascot one of the most epic motherfucking adulterers in human history. And I mean epic. So epic that when I say "motherfucking," who knows, we may yet find out that's literal.


Tiger Woods: Probably has fucked a mother.

In other words it was a choice between bad and really bad, and they went with bad. Then they made Peter Moore write a letter to justify it, because that's the sort of bullshit monolithic corporations have to do.

Not for nothing, but I'm not surprised EA chose to stick with Tiger. This is the company that still has John Madden's name on Madden NFL. That was already ridiculous when Madden had only been doing color commentary since 1979, and it's even stupider now that he's retired from that.


EA Sports is Probably Reviving NBA Jam

At least I hope this will be a hit, but I honestly don't see how you could possibly screw this up. As far as I can tell there are only four simple elements to making NBA Jam awesome:

1) Dunks only possible in the Matrix.

2) Lighting basketballs on fire.

3) Shattering glass backboards.

4) Deliriously insane cameos.

If that last one doesn't make the cut, I won't blame them. Like the Beastie Boys' 1989 sample-heavy masterpiece Paul's Boutique, I'm pretty sure putting Bill Clinton and George Clinton in the same arcade basketball game was the sort of thing you could only get away with back when lawyers weren't paying attention to crap like that. Those other three, though? You have to try to get them wrong. Hard.


Yup, still awesome.

Then again, NBA Jam already mutated once into the garbage NBA Ballers series, so I guess it's possible to screw anything up. So if your new NBA Jam has me shattering glass basketballs against flaming backboards as secret characters John Madden and Tiger Woods, EA, you and I are going to have words.


Microsoft Announces Interesting but Not Very Exciting 'Game Room'

And lastly, at the 2010 Consumer Electronic Show earlier this week, Microsoft announced "Game Room," a kind-of mundane feature no one feels strongly about one way or the other that lets you purchase old coin-op games and arrange them in your virtual arcade.

Games that will be available include such classics as Centipede, Asteroids, and Lunar Lander, which are kind of cool from a nostalgia-inducing perspective but just old enough to still be kind of pointless also. Pricing was set at a disappointing-but-not-quite-outrageous tier of $3-5 to purchase a game, or 50 cents for two one-time plays on any arcade game you don't own.

Gamer reaction has been expectedly apathetic. "Meh," said 360 owner Rolfe Stansley. "I mean, I guess it's neat enough. It's kind of also stupid, though. Can't we already play classic arcade games on Xbox Live Arcade? Isn't that why it's called Xbox Live Arcade? But whatever, it's an extra feature."

"I was a little more excited when I thought I could actually walk around my arcade as my Avatar," said 360 owner Bill Sanders, taking a long drag from his cigarette. "It would have been just like that movie, Avatar. I even started chain-smoking to simulate it perfectly. Then I found out you couldn't walk around, it's just more of a glorified browser. Which doesn't necessarily make it suck or anything, but, you know. Whatever."

Experts say that although Game Room hasn't inspired a lot of enthusiasm from 360 gamers, it also hasn't made everyone curse Microsoft out either, which is probably the best response they could have possibly hoped for.

 
0
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (9)
Default_picture
January 09, 2010
Something that does make James Cameron's line of argument at least slightly unsound is the fact that Avatar has a game of its own on store shelves.

Does he want us to buy the game and a pack of cigarettes on the way home too? He'd probably rather us just buy into his franchise and didactic commentary, but nothing else. Yeah, I bet that works for him.
Default_picture
January 09, 2010
Yup, that probably does. But I guess what I'm saying is that while I agree we should be vigilant in defending gaming against critics who just want to hate on it, that doesn't mean there aren't aspects of gaming that should be legitimately criticized (and obsessive gaming can be one of them, just like excessive TV watching, etc.)

Cameron's point may have been made in a rather unsophisticated manner, but then again, that's Avatar in a nutshell, so what are you gonna do.
Default_picture
January 10, 2010
Can someone please explain Unobtanium to me? I've seen it in several reviews and stories as the butt of some inside-nerd-joke but I just can't understand it. I usuall get stuff like this straight away but I've been scratching my head for weeks. Maybe if I saw the film I'd understand?
Default_picture
January 10, 2010
As for the arcade, I can see this being fun IF I'm allowed to play games that my buddy owns. Kinda stupid if he goes out and buys a bunch of games for his arcade that only he can play. What do I do? Come to his arcade to watch?
26583_1404714564368_1427496717_31101969_389938_n
January 10, 2010
Not to turn this into an Avatar discussion, but Sully was exhibiting more signs of "compulsive gaming", right down to the part where they have to remind him to eat and ask him when he showered last. Having said that, I don't think the existence of maybe four cigarettes in a three-hour movie constitutes "chain smoking," unless they were all smoked end-to-end. Like a chain.

@Tom - Unobtanium in our universe is the joke name of "that which is perfect for what we are trying to accomplish". It's just a theoretical thing with whatever qualities a person puts on it. In the film it might as well have been called McGuffinite.
Default_picture
January 10, 2010
@Evan What I don't understand is just what the hell is so funny about "unobtan" because that word doesn't register for me. I don't understand on a very basic basic basic level. Is it because it sounds like "unobtainable"? If so, that's stupid, not clever. Now, if it WAS called "MacGuffinite" I'd be laughing my balls clean off my body, but as it stands, I just feel like a stupid first grader.
"Why's it called a cloud?!".
"Because that's what it is. Shut up.".
"But why CLOUD?!?!".
"Because you're adopted. Fuck off."
That sums up how dumb I feel.
Default_picture
January 10, 2010
I used to love NBA Jam. I wouldn't mind seeing another as long as it's done well. EA's NBA Street was an okay arcade basketball replacement, but it just didn't do it for me.
Default_picture
January 10, 2010
Wouldn't count on a NBA Jam revival to be any good. Remember what happened to NFL Blitz. The early ones were the NFL equivalent to Jam, but when they revived it, they turned it into a bone breaking steroid fest.
January 11, 2010
I got Cameron's reference and I thought it was brilliant. I know of a few people who will CONSISTENTLY neglect their eating and/or drinking health, but NEVER to the detriment of their online avatar/toon of statistical perfection. Irony.

Visions of cheetos and Mountain Dew and that WoW stein come to mind...
You must log in to post a comment. Please register or Connect with Facebook if you do not have an account yet.