Separator

How a PC gamer learned to love the PlayStation 3

Default_picture
Monday, April 11, 2011
EDITOR'S NOTEfrom Layton Shumway

I can relate to Michael's tale. Just this past weekend, I introduced a friend of mine (a hardcore PC gamer) to Demon's Souls. He immediately wondered why such a deep, unique experience wasn't on PC. That's Bitmob for you -- crushing gaming stereotypes one player at a time.

Many gamers have fond childhood memories of Mario or Sonic. My youth, however, was filled with space marines on Mars and tech trees.

Doom

When I reached the tender age of 11, my parents decided to buy me a computer. This computer also came with copies of Civilization, Warcraft, Privateer, X-Com, TIE Fighter, and Doom, courtesy of my uncle. These were really the games that I grew up on -- they formed the foundation of my hobby.

For the next six years, my PC was the only thing I played. I even became a competitive player in Team Fortress (the mod for Quake), Tribes, and Counter-Strike. No Dreamcast, Nintendo 64, PlayStation, or PS2 for me. Consequently, I have extremely biased tastes.

However, since my family views me as a gamer, I have ended up owning the main consoles for this generation anyway. I received an Xbox 360 as a gift, my wife received a Wii as a gift, and I bought her a DS because she’s a fan of the Nintendo classics and platformers. The only system we didn't have was a PS3. And I began to wonder what all the hubbub was about.

 

From my viewpoint, the 360 served as a Geometry Wars 2 and Forza machine. For everything else, it felt like an underperforming PC. The Wii was nothing more than a short distraction, and the DS was a Civilization Revolution machine. In total, I probably didn’t put more than 20 hours of gaming into the console world in the past five years. 

I had often looked over the PS3 threads on various forums and blogs with bewilderment. How can so many people have so much fun playing games where all you do is hit the X button when asked or sit through hours of cut-scenes? In my mind, this medium is supposed to be about emergent narrative integrated with gameplay. I didn't see that.

However, a few PS3 titles stuck out to me as wildly interesting: Demon’s Souls, Valkyria Chronicles, Flower, Infamous, and the PixelJunk series. So last Christmas I decided I’d finally take the plunge -- I bought a PS3 with the games named above and jumped in.

My first impression was probably the most important compliment that I can give a console: It was treating me like an adult. The system had a clean interface, no silly avatars, and no overly comical menu. I spent quite a bit of time diving deep into Demon’s Souls and Valkyria Chronicles. These two games felt so unique and immersive that I finally started to see what I had been missing out on. They didn't hold my hand, and they both had a very difficult learning curve, which is something I’ve always appreciated. Again, Sony's console treated me like a grown-up.

Flower and PixelJunk Eden were mind-opening experiences for me -- I found myself enjoying them even though they are extremely linear games where it is nearly impossible to fail. The magic of these titles is that, although everyone paints the same picture in the game, how you paint that picture is entirely up to you. This led me to Katamari Forever, which I can't praise enough.

After 16 years of being almost exclusively a PC gamer, I now find myself dedicating a decent amount of time to a console. There really is nothing like these types of experiences on the PC -- that's why I find myself constantly pulled back to the couch. In addition to that, they hit some of the same chords that a classic PC gamer appreciates: immersion, emergence, and integrated narrative.

For you PC gamers holding out or those who feel they haven't quite clicked with the Japanese game design aesthetic yet, the PS3 is definitely worth a shot. You might find yourself surprised. I know I did.

 
Problem? Report this post
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (6)
Robsavillo
April 08, 2011

Also coming from a primarily PC background, I too find that the PC/PS3 combo covers enough ground to keep me satiated.

Image1
April 11, 2011

I'm primarily a PS3 gamer, and a lot of that is because of my history with PC.  Not so much the titles, I guess, as the platform itself.  I liked the "openness" of the system. Being able to swap hard drives or (at the time) install alternate operating systems. Functionality with Bluetooth devices allowing me flexibility to use hardware and peripherals I wanted, free online services, etc.

I think it's a very PC-oriented platform. Moreso than the Xbox 360 which is based on the same kind of architecture, but is much more stringently controlled and closed.

I also use my PS3 more for cross-platform endeavors, such as media streaming (search PS3 Media Server), and I found some drivers to use DualShock 3 controllers on PC.

Now with some form of Steamworks coming to PS3, I'm realizing that my PC/PS3 paradigm might not have been completely fabricated. :-P

100media_imag0065
April 11, 2011

I am glad you found the PS3. For me, I always looked at the 360 as a shooter machine, and the PS3 as an everything else machine. This is why I love the PS3. There is a ton of more variety in the expereinces you can find than on a competitng console like the Xbox 360. Now I have grown up with consoles and PC's. I played both my entire childhood.

Just recently I bought an Asus G73JHA2 in anticipation for Crysis 2...Turns out you can run Crysis 2 just fine on a 3 year old machine and I wasted my time, but that is besides the point. Both PC's and consoles have their ups and downs, but I could never live without both of them.

The PS3 is the only console that you can turn on and be treated like an adult. Just like you said. Sony does not throw all this childish avatar crap in your face. You are a hardcore gamer and Sony knows it. When I turn my 360 on, I might as well be taking a trip through The LaLa Land of Fairy's and Rainbows.

With the PC, you make your own experience, which is a massive upside. I am afraid that insane piracy has nearly ruined the PC gaming space as we know it, and who knows where it may end up in another 5 years. Things like OnLive and browser based gaming might just save the pc.

Me04
April 11, 2011

@Ed: Steam has already saved the PC. ;)

As for the article, I can totally relate. I have a 360, but it mostly goes unused. I'm definitely a PS3/PC combo guy as far as home systems go. On the PS3 I like the clean interface, the fact that the online is free, the way the store charges me in real money instead of space bucks, and the great lineup of exclusives that just wouldn't work quite as well on PC like WipEout HD, Uncharted and inFamous.

Fo1_hires_power_armour-1-2
April 11, 2011

@Ed: but the 360 and PS3 have, basically, the same games. Except for a few exclusives. So it's kind of silly to say that the 360 only has shooters.

I only have a 360 myself, tho. The PS3's exclusives don't interest me that much, except for MGS4 and the Yakuza series. Not like the 360's exclusives are all that interesting, either, tho. (I got the 360 because it was cheaper.)

But whatever. It's good to see PC gamers getting into consoles and playing both instead of only playing on the PC. I also guess that PC gamers find PS3 more interesting than 360 because the PS3 has more exclusives than the 360?

100media_imag0065
April 11, 2011

@Andres

The PS3 does have a ton more original titles that you just won't find on the 360. It is pretty universally accepted that Microsoft funds big explosive games, while Sony tries and funds original content, as well as the AAA blockbusters.

You also have to take into consideration the PSN store. There are a ton of PS3 games at retail and on the PSN store that shine with originality that just won't fit on the 360. It is the better overall system because of this. Games like

Little Big Planet 1 & 2 with its incredibly robust content creation which Microsoft doesn't allow on their consoles. A few games have small level editors on the 360, but a little known rule is that Microsoft does not let retail games have detailed content creation like Little Big Planet does.

Ratchet and Clank: Tools of Destruction / A Crack in Time are from a genre that is all but dead, but Sony is Publishing these amazing games and keeping the genre alive. While Microsoft gave up on it almost immediately when Banjo Kazoie: Nuts & Bolts didn't sell 6 million copies.

Demon's Souls

Pixel Junk Shooter/Eden

Heavy Rain

Folklore

Flower

Valkyria Chronicles

Yakuza 3 & 4

3D Dot Game Heores

Everyday Shooter

Games like this are what make the PS3 special. While Microsoft spends all their $$ focusing on big budget AAA games like Gears of War and Halo, Sony will make sure to support works of art that are not guaranteed to make any profit like Heavy Rain.

This isn't even including the ton of AAA Blockbusters that the PS3 has as well like the Uncharted Series and God of War 3. I myself prefer the smaller, more original games that you simply can't find on store shelves for the 360. Every once in a while you will find one on Xbox Live, but the difference there is that Microsoft had nothing to do with it, while Sony routinely funds art projects and takes risks and doesn't always worry about how many big explosions they can squeeze into their next game with every game they make.

Overall, even though I own a play my 360 a lot, I would sell it in a second to keep my PS3. Some of the best games I have ever played are only on the PS3, and it is the only system that treats me like an adult, and not a child.

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.