Separator

E3 2011: Nevermind who won...the question is: "Where are we going?"

04596077bdbbd4327842d739accd8b0a
Monday, June 13, 2011
EDITOR'S NOTEfrom Rob Savillo

Although Winson remains critical of the new hardware unveilings at this year's E3 (and I'm skeptical myself of a few of his complaints), how these devices evolve the ways that we play games going forward is an interesting question worthy of discussion. What do you think?

I realized I'd been on Twitter way too long when I started fuming on this one, single tweet that read: "Hands down, Sony won this year's E3." What is that...36 characters? Hardly worth losing a night's sleep over. Yet there I was...just absolutely incensed and wondering what gave that person the right to say such a thing.

I watched all three media presentations from Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo. But honestly, who cares who wins in E3 anymore?

 

These presentations ran like the Academy Awards. Different game developers got up on stage, read their cheesy lines, showed the videos, and filled the remaining, awkward silence with a "joke" or two before the eerie woman with the answering-machine voice introduced the next guest. Rinse and repeat. That's what these presentations are.

Voice Search in Xbox Live
 
Of course, the audience is mostly interested in the products, and I'm not sure what to make of most of those this year. Microsoft largely focused on Kinect, and, specifically, voice recognition. I don't have an Xbox 360, so I might not be seeing the entire picture here...but why should video-game experiences be based on voice-controlled menu navigation or gestured-driven gun construction? Like Adam Sessler had previously said in his soapbox podcast, why is gaming constantly trying to push the envelope to where it doesn't need to be pushed?
 
PlayStation Vita
 
Same thing with Sony's presentation, where they pushed 3D in a very big way. Every 10 minutes or so, they told the audience to "please put on your 3D glasses now." They're even releasing a PlayStation branded 3D television. Yet in all of the gameplay videos and demonstrations, I have yet to see any evidence why 3D gaming is a must-have instead of a nice-to-have.
 
Nintendo WiiU Controller
 
And then there are the hardware announcements:
  • The PlayStation Vita. It's basically a Wifi and 3G enabled PSP, but with better graphics, a touch screen, front and back camera, and...a rear touch pad? Again, Sony has failed to answer why I need a rear touch pad. To make the mountains go higher? How is that taking gameplay to the next level?
     
  • Nintendo announced the successor to Wii, named the WiiU; except, is it really a successor? Or is the new controller the only feature? This device has a 6.2" screen, which provides players with a place to view secondary information or allows them to switch the output from T.V. to controller. But why does any of that matter if I can't use the controller as a portable, iPad-like device? And just who asked for these very features? Why should we care?
These presentations are like watching Lost. Instead of providing answers, I'm left with more questions. "Who won E3 this year?" I honestly don't care because I'm too busy trying to find out where these E3 presentations are taking us.
 
Problem? Report this post
WINSON SHUEN'S SPONSOR
Comments (12)
Dscn0568_-_copy
June 07, 2011

I thought all the technology was cool and interesting, but not many of the games made me that inspired to play them. Reggie probably said it right in the Nintendo conference that we just want new ways to play the same old stuff, but the lack of any many IPs took the thunder out of the events for me. I liked the new Insomniac game, Kid Icarus, Tomb Raider, Rayman, and Sly Cooper, but most of those franchises are coming back after lengthy abscenses. 

04596077bdbbd4327842d739accd8b0a
June 13, 2011

From what Nintendo was showing at E3, I doubt Wii U will be ready by 2012 (even if it's holiday 2012). Not only do they not have any actual games on the E3 showfloor (only tech demos), but they don't even have any details on the console other than the Wii U controller.

I actually thought for a long time during the presentation that it's just a new controller.

Pict0079-web
June 07, 2011

I guess they were trying to make their consoles look like revolutionary iPad-killers, but I wanted to see more original games. I really didn't care that much for the return of these old characters. I want something original, but these presentations aren't showing me any of that.

I really wanted solid, fresh games to make me appreciate the hardware. Instead, I ended up seeing more of the same characters returning. Old classics are fun, but I wanted more originality.

Pshades-s
June 13, 2011

Forgive me for tooting my own horn, but I wrote a rather similar story last year: http://bitmob.com/articles/e3-whoever-wins-we-lose

Personally, I'm pretty optimistic about the new hardware shown at E3 this year, but neither Sony nor Nintendo did a good job convincing me I need a new machine. Anything I buy will be either out of faith in previous hardware or based on information that has yet to be revealed (particularly Nintendo's online strategy - will they wake up and smell the DL potential?)

Profile_pic4
June 13, 2011

 

This piece really resonated with me.

The games were the most exciting thing I saw while reviewing E3 stuff.  Heck, the Sly 4 teaser trailer was enough to make me ecstatic.  Halo 4 was also nice to see, if not expected.  And all the “exciting new direction” stuff was wildly boring to this early tech adopter.

While I do have all three consoles, an LCD capable of 3D viewing, and a Kinect... I have not played a game in 3D, and I do not so much care about being able to disassemble and reassemble a gun in Ghost Recon using my hands in space.  I want to get -- and stay -- in the action.

There seems to be a “showroom” focus or trend emerging.  I think car games started this and are notorious for it, but now I can view suits in Crysis 2.  Yaaaaaaaay, me.  So the Ghost Recon gun thing was not exciting to me.  Maybe I’m missing something.

04596077bdbbd4327842d739accd8b0a
June 13, 2011

Yup. While I mainly focused on the hardware aspects of the E3 presentations this year, I do agree that the games are much more exciting. Assassin's Creed, Uncharted and Gears of War 3 all looked really solid. I do wish there'd be original IPs though, it's getting "more of the same" for a while now.

On the flip side, Nintendo didn't really show anything we didn't already know; kind of a 180˚ from last year's E3, imho.

Default_picture
June 13, 2011

The presentations sounded like the Spike Video Game Awards show. Was there awkward silences while the tragically un-hip crowd didn't "get" the jokes?

And my opinion on 3D gaming is well known. I think the whole phenomenon is a gimmick that will eventually implode.

9657
June 14, 2011

I think that touchscreens and maybe even multi-display gaming will be around for a while, but I can't help but think that in the years to come, many of the more gimmicky kinds of control schemes and other input devices might be looked at like smell-o-vision or electrified theatre seats. While the PSV and the Wii U both seem pretty cool, it is *always* the software that will be the measure of a system. I think that it's just too early to tell, but I predict some very cool stuff coming from the Wii U and PSV.

Default_picture
June 14, 2011

Smell-o-vision was only used in one film and never achieved the level of market penetration that 3D, touchscreens, and motion sense has. I agree that software is of paramount importance, and many of the gimmicky control schemes will eventually vanish. But it'd be a mistake to dismiss 3D as another smell-o-vision. If nothing else, every manufacturer stands behind 3D 100%--one need only attend CES to see how strongly the tech is being pushed.

Profile_pic4
June 14, 2011

"Pushed" is the key word here.  Sony has a vested interest in selling a ton of new Bravias and so is pushing this like I haven't seen since... Blu-ray.

Advertising = / = acceptance

9657
June 14, 2011

Not to derail the entire conversation and just harp on 3D, but does anyone know a single person (that isn't in PR) that is really hyped up for a 3D future? I just can't wrap my head around it. I simply don't care about 3D at all. Maybe something will change my mind....

Default_picture
June 14, 2011

I've dealt with a lot of PR ppl in the consumer electronics industry and they're the only ones who seem to be psyched for the forthcoming "3D revolution". Sony is on the 3D warpath, judging by E3 and this year's CES, but thus far, consumers have let out a great big shrug.

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.