MLG: The next step for gaming?

Default_picture
Thursday, May 17, 2012

 

I can’t decide whether to despise MLG (Major League Gaming, in case you can’t read that massive banner) for trying to turn my favorite hobby into a contest, or passionately support their cause to bring competitive gaming to the West.

The MLG, for those of you unfamiliar, is a sports league unlike any other. They organize tournaments for popular competitive games such as Call of Duty or Halo, complete with large cash prizes. Just like the NFL or the NBA, teams composed of gamer “athletes” (I know, it’s a bit of a stretch) train for these events. Some of the tournaments have even been broadcast over ESPN.

This always makes me wonder, is the MLG helping to legitimize gaming?

Anyone who knows me, knows I love gaming (it’s almost unhealthy). It would probably be more accurate to say that I eat, sleep, and breathe videogames. I’ve been playing for as long as I can remember, and I don’t intend on stopping anytime soon.

I love the direction that games are headed. Triple-A and indie games coexisting, videogames being declared art, and new and unique games coming out constantly – the games industry is headed in a fantastic direction. But I can’t decide whether or not the MLG is a part of that.

I have to wonder if this might be how racing fans felt when racing was made into an official sport. Decades before I was born, racing was a much smaller sport. Most competitors truly loved the sport, and would have raced even if they weren’t paid. It was the love of the sport that kept them going. When racing became more organized though, things began to change. Rules were imposed, and eventually racing became a career, instead of a passion.

Of course there were positive things about racing gaining popularity as well. Televised races, merchandising, and more fans than ever – just a few of the things NASCAR (and other various racing leagues/associations) did for racing. A pretty great trade-off if you ask me. But some would say it took away the love of racing.

Any of this sound familiar? The MLG is doing the exact same thing for gaming. Unfortunately, just like racing, being in the spotlight has its drawbacks. It seems like I can’t go online in certain titles anymore because they’ve just become too competitive. Well, that and the twenty-something-year olds screaming how “MLG” they are. The uber-competitive spirit has completely engulfed some titles.

But I can’t ignore the positive; the MLG is good for gamers. Not only does it give those seeking a more competitive atmosphere somewhere to go, it gives us something to watch. Imagine if one day America watched competitive gaming like baseball of football. Wouldn’t that be awesome?

Maybe this is just part of maturing; I’m learning to share my favorite medium with others. And despite anything anyone dislikes about the MLG, they are helping to expand gaming. Not everyone is going to agree that it’s a good thing, just like how not everyone agrees on games as art, but we have to accept that the games industry is changing.

What was once a child’s plaything is now a multi-billion industry. Games are now art, and an official sport may be next. Some countries have already embraced videogaming as a sport, and who am I to say that it shouldn’t be?

 

What's your opinion?

 
Problem? Report this post
NATHANIEL DZIOMBA'S SPONSOR
Comments (19)
Default_picture
May 17, 2012

If turning a bunch of hooting dickbags into celebrities is what it takes to "legitimize" our hobby, I say we embrace our status as the bastard child of the entertainment industry. Making them out as our elite, as the ones who represent us to the greater public, wouldn't change a thing. Sure, people might stop seeing gamers as childish, but they would instead see us as a bunch of morons that idolize absolute tools.

Default_picture
May 18, 2012

 

I never said they were better than us, or that they represent us. I'm merely saying that gaming is diversifying, and while MLG isn’t the best ambassador, it’s showing people that we can be taken seriously. Gaming is already art, entertainment, and and a social activity. Why can’t it be a sport as well?

Default_picture
May 18, 2012

Gaming isn't, never has been, and never will be a "sport." Nor are gamers "athletes." Call it fun. Call it art. Call it entertainment. But gaming is no more a "sport" than Monopoly or Poker. And I'm not sure why some are so insistent on shoving a square peg into a round hole.

And the denizens of MLG are terrible ambassadors for the medium. Give me Jenova Chen. Or Peter Molyneux. Or David Cage. But the stereotypical image of crass, sexist FPS players does gaming no favors.

Jayhenningsen
May 18, 2012

Jason - The number one definition of "sport" according to Merriam-Webster is "A source of diversion: Recreation." Although I agree about "athletes", I have to disagree on "sport."

Default_picture
May 18, 2012

But where do we draw the line, Jay? Do we consider any organized competition, whether it involves physical activity or not, a "sport"? Is Risk a sport? Chess? They're fun diversions, mind you; their tactical nature engages the mind. But I wouldn't call them "sports".

We need some sort of standards...otherwise, the term becomes vague and, ultimately, meaningless. I would submit that activities like baseball, football, and even bowling deserve to be classified as "sports." Gaming is just fine as a competition or source of entertainment.

Lolface
May 18, 2012

According to Merriam-Webster, the second definition of "sport" is sexual play. On the other hand, the first definition of "sport" given by Google is, "An activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others." I like Google's definition better. And I firmly believe that gaming is not and can never be a sport.

Default_picture
May 18, 2012

Lumping MLG with other sports would just be an insult to athletes. If your definition of sport is broad enough to encompass all games (and beyond), then are "games" and "sports" completely interchangeable to you?

I'm going to go play some sports in my underwear now.

Default_picture
May 18, 2012

Just like how Rogert Ebert thought games could never be art, right?

Default_picture
May 18, 2012

Nathaniel, video games share many aesthetic and artistic similarities with movies, books, and other sources of entertainment. But the only real similarity between gaming and sports is competition...and that's a stretch.
 
I say this a great admirer of both sports and video games: We should not confuse athletes with gamers.

Jayhenningsen
May 18, 2012

Why does it matter? Is sports really some hallowed word that needs protection? Are self-described sports fanatics going to subvert the word for their own usage? Are we eventually going to take every word in the English language, ignore hundreds of years of etymology, and apply only one narrow definition to it that fits only a select group of people? The root of the word "sport" is from the Old French "desporter," meaning "pleasure or diversion." It meant "pasttime, recreation, and pleasure" in the 1400s. The first recorded usage that indicated physical activity didn't appear until 1520.

I also fail to see how calling games a sport is an insult to athletes. We're not calling video games athletics; we're calling them sports. Ironically enough, the definition of athlete is: "a person who is trained or skilled in exercises, sports, or games requiring physical strength, agility, or stamina." Note the word "games" there. Funny, huh?

What if the competition was centered solely around Kinect games that required full-body motion? Don't those require agility, skill, and stamina to play for extended periods of time? Wouldn't that, by the definitions above, beecome a sport? Wouldn't a person who excelled at such an activity requiring those traits be termed an athlete? 

Default_picture
May 18, 2012

I realize this, that's why I put athletes in "quotes".

I'm merely saying that as much people might (and already have) disagreed, gaming may be the next big sport. Some countries ALREADY consider it a sport. MLG has been on ESPN, a SPORTS network. I don't think it's a stretch to consider the possibility that games may one day be deemed a sport.

Ten years ago, (almost) nobody thought games would be considered art. We all know what happened in that case.

Default_picture
May 18, 2012

ESPN has also broadcast the World Series of Poker and Magic: The Gathering, and I wouldn't consider either one "sports."

Default_picture
May 19, 2012

I feel like nobody here has actually been to a MLG event or knows about competitive gaming. I'm an MLG player (competitive Starcraft 2, Gears of War 3, and Super Smash Bros Brawl player) and it's not what everyone thinks it is. It's not a bunch of gross-ass, ridiculously lazy gamers talking shit to each other; it's normal people, just like you and me, who love competitive gaming and want to put their skills to the test. And all the people in the crowd are those that love to watch high-level play and enjoy the commentary, the hype, the atmosphere.

I've met some of the most passionate people at these events, and they are just everyday people that just happen to be big SC2 fans or big LoL fans or whatever. I've met bodybuilders, accountants, teachers, college students, parents (parents without their kids even), all just people who love competitive gaming. And there's no reason to hate it - we love gaming just as much as anyone else, just in a different way.

And honestly, we call it "eSports" but no one cares what we call it. Call it pro gaming, competitive gaming, esports, whatever, but to us it's just a passion that extends past just treating gaming like a hobby. Not only is it not wrong to be a competitive gamer, but other gamers dismissing it and whatnot just isn't cool. Yeah there are those random MLG kids that may bash casuals or whatever, but they are the exception - we're all really nice and just love esports!

Default_picture
May 19, 2012

This is a great response.

I have never been to the events but live sport (and thats what this is, really) is always a great spectacle. Unfortunately, MLG events arent that readily accessible - at least to me there's never been one in my city, hell I dont even know if there has been one in Australia. Therefore watching live streams is all I have and currently I think that that facet of MLG isn't great. I cant pinpoint why right now, but I am going to have a think about it.

Default_picture
May 19, 2012

Trust me, I know what you mean. I actually didn't like MLG much at all until recently, when they really took themselves and eSports seriously and redefined the pro circuit. Honestly, as much as watching streams online is good (their streams have gotten much better - if you can afford it, try to watch a PPV Arena stream when those come around, the production quality is fantastic, but otherwise Pro Circuit events are streamed for free), being at the events in-person is just absolutely amazing for any kind of gamer. It just feels great to be surrounded by gamers, and really good ones, to boot! It's a lot of fun, even for those who aren't playing.

I just hate it when people feel the need to crap all over what other people enjoy when we're not doing anything to stop them from doing what they enjoy. I don't care how people enjoy games, as long as they enjoy games, they're cool with me (and even if they don't, they're still cool with me :) ). 

People just need to be less judgemental and more open. The events are a blast, the atmosphere is amazing, you get to meet a ton of great, passionate gamers, and you get to watch the best of the best in action for an entire weekend several times a year. That to me is an awesome deal.

Default_picture
May 20, 2012

 

So as a pro gamer (which I'm assuming you are), was my article fair to MLG and its competitors?

Default_picture
May 20, 2012

I used to go to MLG events back when Halo 2 was still cool, and I know the stereotype isn't always true. But I still don't think we should just lump competitive gaming with sports.

Default_picture
May 20, 2012

@Nathaniel: Yeah I'd say it's fair. I mean, competitive gaming has been around for a while and MLG isn't the only circuit in the world, so it's not like MLG came out of nowhere and said, "Let's make gamers play for money!". This thing has been around for over a decade, and there are tons of circuits - OSL, GSL, SKP, Dreamhack, CPL, etc. So MLG isn't the only one.
 

@Danny: Agreed, competitive gaming is not a sport. I don't think it is. I don't try to label it as that because it doesn't matter - I don't care what you call it. I just call it competitive gaming or esports (which is just glamorizing the phrase "competitive gaming" and is more recognizable and easier/shorter to say/type). 

Default_picture
May 19, 2012

I have always thought that there needs to be more WWE like pomp in the MLG to make it interesting. Yes, it makes everyone more competitive, but what I truly care about is making it watchable. Making video games watchable even if you arent good at them yourself. I watch basketball religiously and its constantly exciting. To me, video game competition isn't all that enthralling sometimes. I want to see the big guys of each game have their own entrance music, ridiculous costumes and over the top commentary. If MLG wants to expand gaming culture it needs to embrace the every man because currently the only people that watch MLG are already gamers, where as you can find any amount of part-time supporters of basketball at a basketball game.

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.